Author: Sander Klemann

  • Towards a European Time & Frequency Network

    Towards a European Time & Frequency Network

    Introduction

    Last month, GÉANT organized a physical edition of the Special Interest Group Time & Frequency Network (SIG-TFN) at the Joint Science Centre (a research and advisory body of the European Commission). During this event in Italy, NRENs and NMIs came together to further develop the framework for a European Time & Frequency network. In this blog, I will explain what this network aims to achieve and what role SURF plays in it.

    From National to International

    In recent years, many national NRENs (National Research & Education Networks), together with NMIs (National Metrology Institutes), have established Time & Frequency networks. These networks distribute time and frequency signals via optic networks to researchers and, in some cases, commercial parties. Various types of scientific research benefit from the improved synchronization and calibration of measuring equipment, leading to more refined results.

    Want to learn more about how we do this and how it works? Read more about SURF Time & Frequency [here], or listen to the podcast I recorded on this topic with SURF.

    What was still missing was cross-border connectivity between these national networks. GÉANT is now working with NRENs and NMIs to develop a network that connects individual countries.

    A Golden Partnership: NRENs & NMIs

    In recent years, NRENs and NMIs have increasingly found common ground and are working together more closely. NMIs provide the clocks and the sources for the Time & Frequency signals, while NRENs supply the network infrastructure and expertise to distribute these signals.

    Interestingly, the creators of these atomic clocks—who typically provide the source for current Time & Frequency networks—now require the network themselves to further develop the so-called optical clocks.

    Optical Clocks

    Optical clocks are the next generation timekeeping devices, capable of measuring time with far greater precision than the current cesium atomic clocks. By using lasers instead of microwaves (higher frequency means higher precision), these clocks can measure time up to hundreds of times more accurately than the current generation. By 2030, this technology is expected to lead to a redefinition of the second.

    But how do we know if an optical clock is working correctly? Measurement requires comparison. If you want to measure the length of a bacteria, you wouldn’t use a standard tape measure—you need a more precise instrument. Similarly, an optical clock, which would only drift by one second over 15 billion years, can only be tested by comparing it to another optical clock.

    However, you can’t simply pack an optical clock into a suitcase and take a train from Amsterdam to Braunschweig (where another optical clock is being developed). A different approach is needed.

    A picture of a research clock at the UvA. More info see iqclock.eu.

    Comparing Clock Signals via the Network

    What is possible, however, is the transmission of an optical clock’s frequency signal via a network. This allows clocks in different locations to be compared. And not just two clocks—you need multiple clocks to determine if any of them have a deviation.

    The technology for transmitting these frequency signals is now so advanced that the signal loss is smaller than the uncertainty of the clocks themselves. This is precisely what the first phase of the Core Time/Frequency Network (C-TFN) enables. Through this network, Dutch clocks at UvA Amsterdam Science Park are compared with clocks from Germany and France. Amsterdam Science Park will play a central role in this new network, creating a unique situation where signals from the world’s best NMIs converge and are analysed.

    National Ultra Stable Optical Frequency Network

    Not only timekeeping researchers benefit from these signals. Several SURF members, such as ESA, VU, and TU/e, have already expressed interest in gaining access to these highly precise frequency signals.

    The technology enabling this, Ultra Stable Optical Frequency Transfer (a kind of “White Rabbit on steroids”), is another factor of 1000 more precise than White Rabbit, reaching precision levels in the pico- and femtosecond range. This has applications in fields such as quantum computing. That’s why we are already installing filters in the national network to distribute these signals. This way, SURF continues to lead the way in supporting researchers in the Netherlands.

  • What you need to know about… time & frequency transfer

    What you need to know about… time & frequency transfer

    Did you know that radio telescopes are synchronized down to the nanosecond (1/1,000,000,000 s) via the SURF Network? And that VU leverages the frequency signal provided by SURF to determine the weight of an electron?

    Through the new SURF Time & Frequency network, the Dutch UTC time from VSL in Delft is distributed with extreme precision across the Netherlands via the SURF fiber optic network.

    ???? Curious to learn more? Last month, I recorded a podcast at SURF about Time & Frequency Transfer, where I explain what this technology is and how it is used.

    Listen here.

  • SURF stops support for IP Multicast

    Since the nineties, SURF has supported IP Multicast within its network. What once started as a special network for this technology, grew into a standard part of the SURF network. However, after decades of use, SURF has decided to phase out IP Multicast. In this blog post I will explain what IP Multicast exactly is, how it was used within SURF in the past, and why the technology must now make way for modern alternatives.

    What is IP Multicast?
    IP Multicast is a technology that makes it possible to send data from a server to multiple recipients in a scalable way. The server only needs to send the data once, after which the network takes care of the replication to all recipients.

    An example of this is the broadcasting of a live lecture to various universities in the Netherlands. Instead of the live video stream being sent multiple times from the source (once for each recipient), it is only sent once via IP Multicast. The network then ensures that the stream is distributed to all affiliated universities. This reduces the required bandwidth and ensures more efficient use of network resources.

    Use and applications within SURF
    Over the years, this technology has been tested and used in various ways by affiliated institutions. Examples of applications were:

    • Sending television channels to student houses.
    • Broadcasting webcam images, such as those of the coast of Vlissingen.
    • Sending satellite weather images from Germany to the KNMI and universities in various European countries.

    Why is IP Multicast used less these days?
    Although IP Multicast once held great promise, it is increasingly being used less and less due to management complexity and limitations in modern networks. In cloud environments, where networks are often dynamic and virtual, IP Multicast can be difficult to implement. Many networks prefer unicast streaming and Content Delivery Networks because of their greater scalability and flexibility.

    Unicast streaming sends separate data streams to each recipient, which requires more bandwidth, but with the increased capacity of modern networks this is no longer a major issue

    Why is SURF discontinuing IP Multicast?
    None of the old IP Multicast applications are still active, and IP Multicast has not been used on the SURF network for some time. Supporting IP Multicast introduces significant protocol complexity, both for SURF and for the connected institutions.

    By phasing out IP Multicast, SURF is simplifying its network protocols. This decision marks the end of an era, but also opens the door to new technologies and enables a less complex migration to a next-generation network in the future.

  • Time and Frequency Transfer for Research!

    As part of the GÉANT workshop on Time and Frequency Transfer, SURF visited CERN in Geneva, home to the LHC particle accelerator. During the visit, there was a unique opportunity to explore the ELENA experiment, where researchers focus on decelerating created antimatter.

    In addition, SURF is currently rolling out the SURFtime&frequency pilot service. This Dutch TFT network, based on the White Rabbit protocol, will support scientific use cases from institutions such as Delft University of Technology, Nikhef (the National Institute for Subatomic Physics), the European Space Agency (ESA), ASTRON, and many others.

  • New names for SURF network services

    As of January 2024, the names of the network services will change. We are doing this to better align our services with the terms and conventions used in the network community. We hope that this will make it clearer to network administrators which services are provided.

    Current service nameNew service name per 1 Jan 2024
    SURFlichtpadEVPN – Point-to-point
    SURFlichtpad – RedundantEVPN – Point-to-point Redundant
    L2VPNEVPN – Multipoint
    L3VPNL3VPN – Multipoint
    SURFinternetInternet
    Multi Service Poort (MSP)Service Port

    Lightpath becomes EVPN

    The term lightpath, although well established in SURF language, has always caused some confusion. This is not an optically illuminated path but a dedicated network connection over the service layer between two points. EVPN (Ethernet-VPN) is what is provided here and the addition (Point to point vs Multipoint) indicates whether it is set up between two points or more than two points.

    Multi Service Port becomes Service Port

    Under the new All-In Network Tariff, which came into effect on September 1, 2023, institutions can adjust their network port configuration as they see fit. This effectively makes all the network ports “multi” service ports. That is why they will simply be called Service Port from 2024.

    The changed names have been implemented in the network dashboard, on (mijn)surf.nl and on invoices.